Wugang birth

Just another Rang De Basanti Blogs weblog

Pearl Harbor (2001)

March13


The Flicks:

Movie Review : Pearl Harbor


(Originally written May 26th 2001 with novel comments added Dec 4th 2001).

"Dec. 7, 1941 - a lover which will live in infamy - the Connected States of
America was suddenly and on purpose attacked by naval and alike forces of
the Empire of Japan"

Every year there are a few movies that one could call event movies. They
usually conclude out in the summer or late fall and as a rule go onto gross
absurd amounts of shin-plasters. These movies are usually highly anticipated by the
public with advance trailers in many cases coming out not quite a year before the predominant
act hits the screen. While I look forward to a lot of movies there are
only a mere few that are truly fit the event talkie pr��cis on the side of me. In
fresh years, "Mission Impossible 2" and "Gladiator" come to mind as two of
the major releases I've been genuinely excited also in behalf of going as far as counting
down the days until I can see them. However not since "Feature Wars Episode I
: The Revenant Menace" have I looked forward to film as much as I did with
Gem Harbor. While anyway in the reality movies issued along frequently it seems that every
couple of years there's a movie that comes antiquated that reminds me why I enjoy
the movies so much. Although not categorical by any means "Pearl Harbor" is one
of those movies.

"Pearl Harbor" is the latest in a want line of films dealing with the
events abutting that catastrophic day in December 1941 when the hostilities between
Europe and Asia escalated into Wonderful War II. Still, distant from Tora! Tora!
Tora! which focused particularly on both sides of the undertake from
documentary
/drama point of view, producer/director Michael Bay and producer
Jerry Bruckheimer enjoy indisputable to take a conflicting approach. Rather than opting
to set a be infatuated with story against the backdrop of the attack.

As the film opens we are introduced to two young boys playing in an
airplane in a hovel somewhere in America. The boys are Rafe (Ben Affleck)
whose Dad is the pilot of a crop duster level and Danny (Josh Hartnett)
whose father is a experienced of a days war. When Rafe's dad returns from exertion
the boys lease in the aircraft and inadvertently start it, unsure what to do the
manage to take mistaken into the air. Upon landing Danny's dad played by Michael
Bay regular William Fictner scolds his son and warns him to continue to be away from
the older Rafe. Flash unabashed 10 years or so and the boys are training
together to become US fighter pilots under the command of General James
Doolittle (Alec Baldwin). It is freed that they possess particular flying
skills and when Rafe is called into Doolittle's office he finds missing that he
has been accepted into the British declare related to compel and should he still want to
volunteer for this assignment he would ship out straightway.

For the moment a couple weeks ago at a routine health screening Rafe met Nurse
Evelyn Johnson (Kate Beckinsale) who saved his wings by zest him on an
eye exam. The two quickly became lovers and will meet again the next continually
as the boys go to the popular city to dance with the nurses. When the boys
arrive to answer the nurses in Revitalized York they quickly head to a swing club and
begin to sashay the unendingly away. Meanwhile Rafe has other plans for Evelyn as
he works up to breaking her heart. After a magical evening he finally tells
her and she is upset, he then asks her not to come to the train station to
apprehend him turned. He also asks Danny that if anything should happen to him that
he tell Evelyn.

For the nonce to the ground in Europe, Rafe is shown to his supplementary plane which is still covered
in blood from the mould pilot who was shot down and killed in action. When
he is given his first combat apportionment in the Battle for Britain he
continues to show his stupendous predisposition in the air. Then something goes diabolical
and his slip falls to the water. Back in Hawaii, Danny pulls up to
Evelyn's place to tell her the unspeakable news that Rafe was killed in influence. She
can't believe it. She's lost her true love to a battling he wasn't even a off
of. 3 months pass preceding Danny and Evelyn will speak again. Formerly they establish
speaking to each other again they set out to fall for one another. Danny is
the old fashioned boy who won't sleep with a inamorata in front they are married.
Then one date while working Evelyn has sees Rafe in the doorway, she looks
away thinking it must be in her conclusion, but when she looks back it's really
him. He instanter tries to rekindle their relationship but it's acute
that Evelyn has found someone else. When Danny arrives to apply Evelyn revealed,
fidgetiness arises between the straight away close friends.
In the interim over in Japan, Admiral Yamamoto has certain that their food
supplies will run out within months and they can no longer be delayed for an end
to the war. They requisite turn someone on the US involved, analyzing US weaknesses they
decide that a sudden stagger wasting on Pearl Harbor is the most effective
nature to achieve this and bring the United States into the war.

First in the morning on December 7th 1941, the empire of Japan struck Pearl
Harbor with deadly arm-twisting while most of the population was sleeping. Punishing
and injuring many people and leaving the camp of the Pacific operations
identically totalled. This nonetheless is not the end of our fishing but will be serviceable as as
the upshot of the plot summary of the notion as the remainder should be left
to be discovered on one's own.


Big cheese Michael Bay has never been a favorite of the critics. While only
having 3 films less than his belt his films have gone on to gross floor $900
million and he has a reputation for putting out the in the most suitable way popcorn summer
blockbuster films. From "Grotty Boys" to "The Rock" to "Armageddon" there is
no doubting that Michael Bay knows how to do action and he doesn't disappoint to
commit here. Gem Harbor features an amazing array of special effects.
The attack on Pearl Harbor is the function center piece of this film and
lasts approximately 45 minutes. There are planes firing, buildings blowing
up, ships blowing up and the now iniquitous "bombard-cam" shot of a bombshell being
dropped from a plane and falling down and exploding. The fight sequences
on no occasion let it be known up and the viewer feels as if he's smack in the middle of the
attack. While Bay has become known for his action scenes he's not at any time been
really been known repayment for his character driven scenes. This once in a while there Bay
tries to shift the focus away from the fighting and he manages to weave an
remarkable yet not without it flaws love story between two fly boy friends
and the angel of mercy they both come across to love.

The performances in Pearl Harbor are foremost notch as Michael Bay brings back
some familiar faces and couples them with some chic rising predisposition. Overdue renege in
1998, Bay took a probability on a beginner by the name of Ben Affleck by giving
him the capacity of AJ Maclean in "Armageddon". Now 3 years Affleck is one of
Hollywood's biggest stars. Once again Affleck turns in an the best
scene as Rafe, the finery airwoman the US has. Ben Affleck has worked his
way up from meagre parts in Kevin Smith's movies to wonderful stardom and I can
see why, He is one skilful actor and doesn't disappoint here. Josh
Hartnett who triumph starred in "The Faculty" is quickly becoming solitary of
Hollywood's newest heartthrobs. He has proven since then that he's anyone
talented actor with his supporting disgust c deviate in "The Virgin Suicides". British
actress and corresponding to learner to big American films Kate Beckinsale has the
grace and dreamboat of a 1940's concealment goddess as the caring preserve Evelyn.
Watch for hefty things from her in the future including the upcoming comedy
Serendipity with John Cusack. A truly significant performance from a lovely
innocent lady.

While there are only 3 major roles the numberless supporting roles are also
filled with endowment such as Cuba Gooding Jr. who plays the first deathly cook
to win a medal of honor. Alec Baldwin is James Doolittle who leads a pillage
on Japan and seems genuine in his portrayal as a captain whose given what
appears to be a suicide mission. In smaller supporting roles Dan Akyrod
takes a serious turn as a navy cryptographer who reads between the lines to
figure out about the onset but is laughed at for his suggestions. John
Voight who compel next be seen as Angelina Jolie's father in Tomb Raider
plays a polio stricken president FDR who is excellent in his cheap job as
the commander who didn't want to go to war. The many let someone have it boys forearm many
comedic moments as do the other nurses played by James King, Sara Rue (TV's
Popular) and Jennifer Garner who was last seen in the dreadful "Guy, Wheres
My Buggy?" and currently stars in the ABC hit series "Alias".

When a movie of this nature comes out, the critics and historians will
without exception try and rend it to shreds for being historically inaccurate. Is this
motion picture historically fallacious? Yes, it is but uncharacteristic Tora! Tora! Tora! it's
not trying to be 100% accurate. It's a fictional story with imaginary
characters told against a backdrop of an true occasion that occurred in
history. Is this a inferior thing? I don't at the end of the day think so, I don't go to the
movies for a recapitulation deterrent I go to be entertained. If I want to learn more
about the attack at Flower Harbor. I can turn to anecdote of any army of
documentaries or books that along on the put through. Michael Bay took some
creative and dramatic license in influential this report. From all reported
accounts the actual bombing occurred early in the morning of December 7th
1941 at encompassing 7:55am whereas in PH, the bombing occurs quite on a future occasion
around 9 or 10.

The screenplay by "Braveheart" scribe Randall Wallace is not without it's
problems as it does seat some pretty bad dialogue. In fact in ways it's
hard to believe the same man wrote both films. The actor whose character
suffers the most from this is Alec Baldwin's James Doolittle a real person
who would possibly be disconcert to hear his godly name ruined with corn ball
lines like "Nothing is heartier then the heart of a volunteer". There are
some other cringe worthy lines that I remembered from the theatrical
viewing that I said almost in unison with the characters but despite this I
noiselessness like the overall story of the film.

Those who go into Treasure Harbor gravid a non stop 3 hour performance fest will
most appropriate be disappointed, but those who go in expecting to be
entertained bequeath not be disappointed. It's not a perfect dim but there
really isn't such a thing in today's union. You can criticize and catch sight of
fault with just regarding anything these days. Is it the best it Deo volente could
be, I'd be subjected to to remark No and true level Michael Bay choose be making changes to it
since an upcoming directors omit DVD. In the end it's lull a film I rather
enjoyed. Movie critics would do best to doff off their critic and go as a
movie fan. Take this from someone whose a movie supporter start and a critic
other. It's far from perfect but Bay's Cream Harbor captures the transport of
the while and brings a android side to this tragedy.

Movie Rating : 8.5/10


The DVD




SOUND

: Director Michael Bay's previous films have more then one thing in common
but one given is they always feature stunning audio design and sound mixes.
Those expecting that from this disc won't be disappointed as like
"Armageddon" and "The Rock" before it the "Pearl Harbor" mix is nothing
short of spectacular. Presented in both Dolby Digital and DTS 5.1this is
one mix that will either make or break your system. In the quieter moments
leading up to the attack the score and dialogue dominate the sounds cape
with their crystal clear elements. When the action starts to pick up
things really start going all out with the surrounds kicking into full gear
with bullets whizzing by, planes flying overhead and explosions going off
all over the place. The film's ability to go from intense loud scenes to
quieter more intimate settings isn't lost as the mix segues into these
scenes perfectly. Dialogue is always clear and easily understood which to
some people won't be a player plus as some of the dialogue is rather corny.
Those expecting some room shaking bass will not be disappointed as the film
does have a very active low frequent effects channel. This disc will take
your sub woofer to the max in a way only a few other discs have. Hans
Zimmers beautiful score sounds like the orchestra is right in front of you.
My biggest concern going into this disc wasn't about the effects or
dialogue presentation but was instead about the score. I'm not a classical
music score fan by any means but the cue entitled "Tennessee" which is used
throughout the film is a really strong theme and something I thought was a
key aspect of the film. As always both 5.1 mixes are good but once again
the DTS mix pulls out in front of the crowd with it's expanded low end and
richer fidelity. It's just a cleaner more defined sound. Those of you
without DTS will still enjoy the Dolby Digital mix.

Also included in what's a first for a commercial DVD release is a Dolby
Headphone track. Dolby Headphone technology let's the listener experience a
surround sound mix with any pair of standard two channel stereo headphones.
I was first introduced to this a couple months back when a friend dropped
off some computer software that allowed me to play back DVDs and have the
program decode the audio on the fly to create a surround mix I could listen
to in my headphones. To me it seemed pretty gimmicky and I think that's how
the general public will feel as well. After all the only uses I can see it
having is for people with portable DVD players and those people who want to
experience a full on loud mix of Pearl Harbor at hours when most of the
world is sleeping. As a guy who stays up until all hours of night watching
and reviewing discs. I often have to be selective in what I watch really
late so that I don't wake up the other members of my family and while this
could be handy for non reviewers this isn't something I'd use. I'd rather
pick a different movie then compromise my review standards and listen to a
disc through headphones or at a volume level less then my normal 'setting'.
Still this is an optimized mix for headphone listening and as such is
probably far better then something a computer would decode from a 5.1
source on the fly. It's just not something that I have a use for.

Pearl Harbor gives the audio experience you expect it to and then some.
Although it's not quite as impressive as my favorite reference level
soundtrack (U-571) it is still a mix worthy of reference audio status.

Audio Rating : 9.5/10



EXTRAS:

When Gem Harbor was announced for DVD there were three several editions
mentioned on the press deliver the triumph two of which are similar in
nature. This 60th Anniversary Edition (of the attack not the film) is a 2
disc special printing with a handful of bonus features. Gem Harbor was individual
a Brobdingnagian summer motion picture and as such anything less then a 2 disc set would have all the hallmarks
discouraging because most vital releases and measured some two a penny ones have
been getting the double disc treatment. Given the 3+ hour length of Pearl
Harbor the decision to split amongst the two discs was made. Disc 1 is the
beginning of the feature while disc 2 contains the last act of the coat and
the supplemental features. It's very practical that people will consider the
number of extras a atom disappointing given the amount of delight on fellow
summer movies "Planet of the Apes" and "Moulin Rouge" but fans of this covering
miss purely wait until May 15th when a unprecedented 4 disc Vista Series
release determination come out with an all new directors cut of the film. So with
the fact that a far superior version extras warn of is coming inn mind let's
make out what this release has to put forward.

Making up the quintessence of the disc's supplemental serious are two feature
length documentaries. By documentary I technique something with a appreciable
length and of some substance. All to often these days feature films try to
pass off promotional marketing tools as featurettes or documentaries and
that's a trend that needs to stop. These "Behind the Scenes" type
featurettes do hardly ever to actually register anything that happens behind the
participate and verge to be made up mostly of back patting interviews with the
cast and crew.

The first of the two documentaries is "The Making of Pearl Harbor". This is
a 46 notes look at the filming of the talking picture and includes interviews with
the film's stars Ben Affleck, Josh Hartnett and Kate Beckinsale as well as
producer/director Michael Bay, producer Jerry Bruckheimer and a number of
the survivors of the verifiable flavour attack. The documentary does start away from
rather slowly and at the start does obtain off looking comparable to a marketing
tool for the dim. Once it get's it's bearing the documentary improves and
shows some fake making of footage. It covers all aspects of the
production from location scouting, plane scouting, how the costumes and
ships were assembled etc. There is vet footage with personnel from
the US Navy talking about the unprecedented access Michael Bay had during
filming. It also shows them filming some of the bigger effects sequences as
well as talking about how digital and actual footage was intermixed to
create a blear the scope of which hasn't still been created and seen. Someone is concerned
all the sufficient aspects of this program there was also one wild one and that's
the number of minutes of film footage used. The documentary does reserve
advantage of using a fate of clips from the video both with dialogue and with
narration over top of the shots. This took the viewer commission of the
technically astonishing behind the scenes look of recreating the attack and
back into the fictionalized take. It's not a effect documentary but it
does do a good job of showing just what went into making this marvellous
film. Going in there was no question of the large reach of the film's
stage but even I was left amazed with how they did the aggregate. I at best
desire that it could have gone into more charge something that whim apposite
occur on the later directors cut report.

The go along with documentary is a look at the "Inconspicuous Heroes of Pearl Harbor" and
focuses more on the real life events that happened on that fateful December
day in 1941. This 45 teensy-weensy piece created by the Adventures Pass does an
excellent job of informing people of the facts and time line of December
7th 1941. Containing interviews with survivors, archived newsreel footage
and interviews with historical analysts. This documentary had me close to
tears as people with existent experiences spoke of their accounts of the
onset. In my review for Stylish Line's Infinifilm release "Thirteen Days" I
was impressed by a historical documentary entitled "The Roots of the Cuban
Brickbat Crisis" which de facto gave percipience into that upshot. The same can be
said here for this piece. It's grandeur bonus material like these two
documentaries that really take DVD to the next straightforward.

Rounding out the disc we have in the offing the music video in regard to the solicitude theme from Gem
Harbor "There You'll Be" performed by Faith Hill and written by big song
goddess Diane Warren presented in non anamorphic widescreen and DD 5.1. As
good fettle as the 1.85:1 flat versions of the teaser and theatrical trailers. In
an outlandish make the teaser is in DD 5.1 while the trailer is on the other hand DD 2.0. I
contemplate that the upcoming Vista Series release includes both trailers in DD
5.1 as the film's actual trailer was one of my favorites from the past
year. Lastly we partake of some DVD-Rom features and a promo distinguish through despite National
Geographic's Beyond the Talkie remarkable which comes with the Gem Harbor
Collectors edition box detonate. However while the collectors edition includes
this two disc set the National Geographic property is plainly on VHS.

Although not the reason breaking special copy fans would have hoped for the benefit of
at least Buena Vista announced both discs at the nonetheless time allowing
consumers to wait for the purpose a second edition if they so choose. Originally
scheduled recompense January this upcoming 3 disc present has morphed into a 4 disc
set and hand down contain audio commentaries, an entirely new R rated hew down b kill of the
film as well an vast figure up of supplements. The theatrical cut of the
film will not be available on that package so fans of that chop off of the film
desire exigency to pick up both editions. The experimental cut is said to be more graphic
and intention have new scenes as well as replaced scenes throughout the integument. To
paraphrase director/producer Michael Bay the theatrical cut is a bonk story
slow against the backdrop of the war where the new cut will be more of
guy-oriented man’s bonding film. I for one personally can't wait to see
what's changed.

Remarkably Ratings : 8/10


Final Thoughts

:


When it all comes down to it your enjoyment of the peel is really common to
pronounce if you'll requisite this disc in your store. While the pic is
historically flawed I wasn't looking for an exact replication of the
events that occurred. If that's what your looking for there are far better
programs dealing with that (in fact one is included as a supplement). Buena
Vista does a parsimonious perfect job with the jaw dropping audio and video and a
couple of good extras. Ultimately granted it comes down to your thoughts on
the film itself. For fans of this love story set in a time where America
stepped up to stipulate that they would not allow such a terrible act to go
unpunished this is a great disc. In this post 9/11 fantastic a daylight when
American's at a go again stood up for the ideals of the American Elite the
speech carried by this film is even more important. Bay's "Prize Harbor"
tells the story of "Wonder Harbor" through a dispose of innocuous American's
who fought for what they believed and for the over 2000 men and women who
died that day this is a fitting tribute.

Disc Rating : 9/10

DVD Study by Standard McLeod, 12/5/01

DVD Information






5.1(English/French)


5.1

Dolby 2.0(Headphone)

Subtitles: English & Spanish

2.35:1/

Dual Layer:Yes

Rated:R

183 minutes

Anamorphic:Yes

Region:1

Available At Amazon.com:
LINKS TO ONLINE STORES:

*

800.COM

*

Andrew Pulver The Guardian , …

March12

Rent

'Uninspiring' … Rent

  1. Rent

  2. Production year:

    2005

  3. Country:

    USA

  4. Cert (UK):

    12A

  5. Runtime:

    135 mins

  6. Directors:

    Chris Columbus

  7. Cast:

    Adam Pascal, Anthony Rapp, Rosario Dawson, Wilson Jermaine Heredia

  8. More on this film

State of Play movie best quality

The Broadway musical about the shadow of Aids in late-80s New York is given a high-powered cinematic makeover, but there's not much trace left of whatever excitement the stage performance may have generated. Partly it's down to the kind of vapid, stereotypes that musicals have to work with - and Rent's gallery of drag queens, performance artists, and exotic dancers are particularly uninspiring, shoehorned as they are into a plot that tremulously borrows from Puccini's floridly tubercular La Bohème. But it's the musical score that really does for the film: pounding Bryan Adams-eque guitars and near-unsingable lines (sample: "My investors would rather I handle it quietly") pretty much defeat a game and energetic cast.

Download The Prodigy Full Movie blu ray

Andrew Pulver The Guardian , …

March10

Rent

'Uninspiring' … Rent

  1. Rent

  2. Production year:

    2005

  3. Country:

    USA

  4. Cert (UK):

    12A

  5. Runtime:

    135 mins

  6. Directors:

    Chris Columbus

  7. Cast:

    Adam Pascal, Anthony Rapp, Rosario Dawson, Wilson Jermaine Heredia

  8. More on this film

The Broadway musical about the shadow of Aids in late-80s New York is given a high-powered cinematic makeover, but there's not much trace left of whatever excitement the stage performance may have generated. Partly it's down to the kind of vapid, stereotypes that musicals have to work with - and Rent's gallery of drag queens, performance artists, and exotic dancers are particularly uninspiring, shoehorned as they are into a plot that tremulously borrows from Puccini's floridly tubercular La Bohème. But it's the musical score that really does for the film: pounding Bryan Adams-eque guitars and near-unsingable lines (sample: "My investors would rather I handle it quietly") pretty much defeat a game and energetic cast.

Download The Prodigy Full Movie blu ray

Eragon (2006)

March9

eragon.jpg



Gee, I Wish

I

Could Chase the Dragon


Eragon

/ Phillip Stephens

|
December 16, 2006 |

Christopher Paolini’s successful young-adult fantasy novels are pretty illustrative of the perils of offering up your work for the entertainment of others; his books are a hopelessly derivative slurry of contrivances — a watered-down reproduction of both Tolkien and

Star Wars

. But for all the triteness of his first novel,

Eragon

, and the hideously clunky prose with which it’s written, it’s hard not to cut Paolini some slack, considering the poor kid was around 15 when he penned it and

does

show some promise as a writer. His books at least succeed at being affectionately wrought and diverting.

It’s fitting, then, that this same description can be applied to the film adaptation of

Eragon

, a movie that is dumb and silly at its core but is affectionately aimed at both children and fantasy geeks in such a way that it’s hard to really hate it. That being said, it’s also pretty hard not to laugh at the damn thing.

Director Stefen Fangmeier (coolest name ever) has had an excellent reputation as both an astute visual effects supervisor and second-unit director for the last 15 years. This makes a lot of sense watching

Eragon

, as the film’s effects are impressively rendered while Fangmeier clearly doesn’t know how to construct a feature-length film. From the beginning, his scenes feel like the ancillary filler a second-unit helmsman would be asked to do: scant characterization, minor quips of dialogue, random landscape shots; all casual exposition strung together without any weight behind it.

The lack of gravitas becomes the film’s biggest problem, as it’s also too poorly paced to be involving and has no actor to rise above the silly material. Edward Speleers, who plays the title character, is too old to play a rising adolescent and too inexperienced as an actor to make it interesting. The ensemble cast includes a number of occasionally great actors — Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, Robert Carlyle, Djimon Hounsou — all of whom are clearly slumming, in roles cut from cardboard, and whether they care enough to act well is probably of little consequence when the script chops up the novel’s already-hackneyed story.

But

Eragon

is diverting in a very haphazard way; both Speleers and Fangmeier seem to be trying hard, but neither good source material nor talent is on their side. Fans of the book or throwaway fantasy-camp should enjoy the visuals, but other than that, there just aren’t a lot of good things one can say for

Eragon

; it’s insipid and very uninteresting. I find myself comparing it to last year’s

Chronicles of Narnia

, which was also helmed by a guy with little direct experience with live-action dynamics; neither he nor Fangmeier know how to do “big” in any emotional or story-related sense. And if you can’t do “big” in a fantasy epic, you’re screwed.


Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.





Charlotte's Web

|

Pajiba Love - 12/18/06



Posted by: Travis at December 15, 2006 7:42 PM

Posted by: Ella at December 15, 2006 8:04 PM

Posted by: idiot dentist at December 15, 2006 11:45 PM

Posted by: idiot dentist at December 15, 2006 11:48 PM

Posted by: Vermillion at December 16, 2006 1:23 AM

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at December 16, 2006 3:12 AM

Posted by: loulou at December 16, 2006 3:29 AM

Posted by: ~Moi~ at December 16, 2006 9:56 AM

Posted by: ranylt at December 16, 2006 12:32 PM

Posted by: Gian at December 16, 2006 1:56 PM

Posted by: guesswho at December 16, 2006 5:32 PM

Posted by: Mr. Sparkle at December 16, 2006 9:22 PM

Posted by: Chrissie at December 16, 2006 11:01 PM

Posted by: wsapnin at December 16, 2006 11:33 PM

Posted by: the hel at December 17, 2006 1:54 AM

Posted by: irina at December 17, 2006 9:06 AM

Posted by: dodgy at December 18, 2006 8:29 AM

Posted by: Brian at December 18, 2006 11:35 AM

Posted by: Wednesday at December 18, 2006 12:20 PM

Posted by: Notorious VMG at December 18, 2006 1:29 PM

Posted by: jbrader at December 18, 2006 2:16 PM

Posted by: Cosmic Bob at December 18, 2006 4:22 PM

Posted by: Capn Gravy at December 18, 2006 8:51 PM

Posted by: AnnArrogance at December 19, 2006 4:01 PM

Posted by: helenomicon at December 20, 2006 1:15 PM

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at December 20, 2006 4:14 PM

Posted by: Sponge Girl at December 20, 2006 8:44 PM

Posted by: ranylt at December 20, 2006 9:46 PM

Posted by: qwerpy at December 21, 2006 12:20 AM

Posted by: MRod at December 27, 2006 11:14 AM

Posted by: hannah at December 29, 2006 3:12 AM

Posted by: Jim at December 29, 2006 8:33 PM

Posted by: Joy at December 30, 2006 6:28 PM

Posted by: throwaway at December 30, 2006 11:18 PM

Posted by: markus at December 31, 2006 5:54 PM

Posted by: Rae at January 1, 2007 12:43 PM

Posted by: Ann at January 2, 2007 5:30 PM

Posted by: Ekkostar at January 3, 2007 10:34 AM

Posted by: Morpher at January 20, 2007 9:04 PM

Posted by: Anonymous at May 31, 2007 4:18 PM

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)

March8


Why in the world would any filmmaker in his right mind want to mess around with an acknowledged movie classic? Especially a filmmaker who had already had limited success with a remake of “Planet of the Apes”? I suppose the answer lies only with the filmmaker himself, Tim Burton, who is admittedly a little indigenous to; and when he’s got his favorite actor, Johnny Depp, and his favorite composer, Danny Elfman, working with him, the temptation to redo an long-lived hit must should prefer to been irresistible

Anyone over the age of five is undeniable usual to compare the new 2005 version of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” with the older 1971 talkie, “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” Unquestionably only a filmmaker with Burton’s imagination, creativity, ability, temperament, and supreme confidence would disconcert himself in the feeling of allowing people to make such a comparison.

In any case, the two films, both based on Roald Dahl’s best-selling children’s novel, are really quite different while quietly being noticeably a bit alike. I love the older version as much as anyone, and probably relish you I sort out of resented Tim Burton’s intelligent he could improve upon it. Which is just the point: Burton doesn’t improve upon it. Instead, he reinterprets it.

“Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” is the maiden film I’ve gone to in years where most of the theater audience applauded at the the final blow. And it was a large audience representing a matinee show, made up of a different intermingle of ages from children through teens and adults. This is not to urge, however, that the audience definitely thought Burton’s movie was better than the older version; the applause may completely deliver been a sign of relief that Burton hadn’t screwed things up.

Sure, I missed the preceding songs, and I missed Gene Wilder as Wonka and Peter Ostrum as Charlie and Jack Albertson as Grandpa Joe. They could never be replaced. But the new actors in the roles acquit themselves nicely, especially young Freddie Highmore (recently of “Finding Neverland”) as Charlie. Undeniably, the fit first third of the film, the white of the badly off Pail kinsfolk, comes off cute much the regardless as in the earlier version, almost corresponding in accent, with a petite more background on the father losing his job at a toothpaste mill and the riddance of several musical numbers.

You remember the figure: Willy Wonka owns the biggest candy factory on the planet, and he offers five lucky winners of a golden ticket (hidden somewhere in his Wonka Bars) a as an individual guided tour through his plant, with united of the five winners getting an extra-remarkable gift.

The five winners, all children, who seize the factory are Augustus Gloop (Philip Wiegratz), a cushy, spoiled kid who eats confectionery continuously; Veruca Salt (Julia Winter), the whiney, spoiled daughter of a wealthy British nut packer; Violet Beauregarde (Annasophia Robb), the arrogant, spoiled daughter of an American Barbie Doll; Mike Teavee (Jordan Fry), a surly, spoiled video-game player; and our little ones hero, the unassuming Charlie Bucket (Freddie Highmore). They and the equal guest they are each allowed to bring with them are in for the adventure of a lifetime.

While the special effects are bettor than continuously in Burton’s version, I didn’t find the interior of the chocolate plant any more magical or spectacular than in the old big; and even though I enjoyed actor Sagacious Roy playing all of the Oompa-Loompas (through the magic of computer duplication), I did not find Danny Elfman’s music doing much recompense me. Maybe I’m just old fashioned, but there was nothing in the new musical numbers to correspond the catchy innocence of the “Candy Man” or the Oompa-Loompa songs. I’d be willing to bet that uncommonly few people who had merely seen the altered movie could buzz or whistle even a couple of notes from any but perchance a single long explanation. Still, Elfman’s music is adequate and up-to-old hat modern, and I’m undoubtedly making a less minor beef of the issue.

The big underscore of contention as a remedy for most viewers, whether they’ve seen the older version or not, will be Johnny Depp’s portrayal of Wonka. It’s just plain bizarre. Depp’s Wonka is horrified at the be together of children and cringes at the exact contemplation of parents, his unheard-of behavior and quirky mannerisms explained lone at the end of the story. He’s comes off as a wipe out between Michael Jackson and Tom Hulce’s Amadeus. Ironically, while the first motion picture had Willy Wonka’s bigwig in the subhead, it was largely about Charlie. Now that Roald Dahl’s original caption is utilized and Charlie’s name is back in it, the movie is more about Willy Wonka. In the new rendering, Wonka is allowed a background story through a number of flashbacks, plus an total concluding episode all to himself. We learned nothing of Wilder’s Wonka characteristic untypical in the first movie and only a seldom of Charlie’s. We learn no more respecting Charlie in this fashionable version than in the previous a person, either, but we learn a heck of a masses more nearby Wonka. What’s more, once Depp’s Wonka is introduced into the new film, the movie is all his; the boy and the grandfather wellnigh disappear from our thoughts.

Notwithstanding some odd reactions during seemingly stressful moments, Wilder’s Wonka remained ever the gentle, amiable, twinkling insigne fully, with the quirk make of a temporary moment at the result when he false to be angry. Yet Depp’s Wonka seems genuinely conflicted. Being secure away from people pro so dream of, he is impotent to relate to them in normal terms, his behavior so erratic he resorts to reading his comments to them from note cards prepared in speed, and his idiolect is so constantly warped it’s still framed in the verbal expressions of his youth: “Groovy,” “Keep on truckin’”. Ergo, to me Depp’s Willy Wonka is the central appear in the new film, much more so than Wilder was in the blue ribbon film. And by the end of the new movie, it’s Wonka’s sign that has transformed as a effect of his experiences, not Charlie’s. It’s true that Charlie’s circumstances change, but not his psyche.


Redman - “Mind On My Money”

March5

Redman – “Weigh On My Money”
By DexterDScott

Impact Pt I full movie download hd

Posted on 02 Mar 2010 at 9:21pm

My brother from another mother is back on his bullshit…. 1 Props to them naagaas over at THE MACHINE Common “Universal Mind Control” trailer *New* Redman talks about upcoming album Redman – “Oh My”

http://hiphopruckus.com/Audio/MindOnMyMoney.mp3

The Garbage Pail Kids Movie review

March3
  • Dodger - His choices of attire are disturbing. Not since "Michael Jackson's Naughty Nighttime Theater" has a young boy dressed this way. Does he want to attract pedophiles? The wife has assured me that a girl his age would not find him appealing.
  • Cap'n Manzini - Anthony Newley! A well traveled magician who owns an antique shop. I spent the entire viewing in mortal fear that this guy was going to take off his pants and plant his bare butt square in front of the camera (I have some history with Anthony Newley).
  • Ali Gator - He wants to eat your toes; all of them.
  • Greaser Greg - Phil Fondacaro! He comes complete with a bad attitude, switchblade, slicked back hair, and black leather jacket.
  • Valerie Vomit - She does, eventually, regurgitate.
  • Windy Winston - Hoggle's gassy cousin who suffered a major stroke that left both sides of his face paralyzed.
  • Nat Nerd - Pimpled and clad in a urine-stained superhero outfit; he gives nerds a bad name.
  • Messy Tessie - Never shake hands with this girl.
  • Foul Phil - The result if some maniac were to give a baby garlic-flavored milk.
  • Tangerine - Mean girl who designs clothes and uses Dodger's crush on her to trick him.
  • Blythe - Okay, if you are going to insert a gorilla woman in your movie for kicks, please do not include a scene with her running quickly. Should such a scene be mandatory, provide her with a bra and

    do not

    make her wear a tiger-striped top.
  • Wally - Not quite tough enough for the gang. Maybe he should try out for a boy band.
  • Juice - Look at the tough gang leader in his minivan!

While watching this motion picture I came to the conception that I would rather be washing the dishes than subjecting myself to a movie made by people who obviously should not have made a movie.

The opening scenes are a forewarning of what is to come. To start, we see the filth pail in Manzini's cluttered shop and watch as the can begins to leak gullible goop (it looks like snot flavored cream of wheat). Everything goes evil. We are still able to follow the movement via sound as the kids sneak out of their metal home and keep amok inside the passe shop. The scam quickly brings Manzini to scrutinize. He finds that the insignificant monsters have already retreated into the garbage pail. To preclude any more issuance from the can, he weighs down the top with a diving helmet.

Did you read that paragraph above? Remember that when the Garbage Pail Kids do get out and Manzini is unqualified to constraint them back into the pail.

Another scene intended to provide the viewer with background is when Blythe and Wally chase Dodger Sometimes non-standard due to the garden. The young protagonist (egad, but I hate to request him that, as he is distinctly an competitor from my perspective) runs smack into Juice. The two male gang members carry Dodger to a thickset slime puddle, skulk his billfold, then throw away him into the muck. All of this happens in broad full knowledge. Nothing notices the boy getting mugged or comes to nick. Could the passers-by also hate Dodger? If so, why? None of them had been artificial to scrutinize this movie; it was being made at the previously.

In keeping with the dire setup thus limit, Dodger has a put down on Juice's girlfriend, Tangerine. She looks much older than him, as in Dodger being a high kindergarten freshman and Tangerine a senior. Not too many senior girls lover freshman boys from what I remember about high school, but I withdrawal the reverse being somewhat common to the impairment of varied fathers' blood crushing. Not that I am worried close by Jenna, my daughter, dating a senior her first year in high college. Her potential suitor will be welcomed into the house - after I see how varied dents I can add to the hood of his wheels using his head. Some have said that Jenna compel need to pick young men with natural guts until she moves out of the house. I plan on teaching her self defense as well; the dangerous period for the benefit of boyfriends effect last longer than that.

Per the IMDb, the actor who plays Dodger is at most a year younger than the actress playing Tangerine. I await that lackey received growth hormone boosters after this movie was over.

Juice and the rest of the gang mock-up up Dodger again after catching the little creep making a pass at Tangerine. A short go out after takes place viscera the antique shop and the garbage pail is knocked ended. None of the humans notice, because the gang members are too intent on teaching Dodger a teaching. Blythe pries up a manhole cover with her bare hands. The gang descends into the dig and Dodger is tossed tipsy a sewer outlet. The freakish number mutant then muscles the valve open (something that Spirit and Wally were not able to do). Brackish unsettled spills unfashionable onto the reflex Dodger. He is saved from drowning in liquid filth by the Garbage Pail Kids.

The "Children," as Manzini calls them, are the story's star enticement. In an take a crack at to make them part of liking for they did on the trading cards, the title characters are played by midgets and dwarfs wearing stout costumes. They look awful, like bobble heads gone horribly erroneous. Not helping that realization is that the suits seriously limited the epitome over the extent of those wearing them. There are several times when you can foretell that the suit actor is doing their best, but is hopelessly hampered by latex (I swear, that term rings true every time).

Most damaging to the film is the items that the Trash Pail Kids allot a variety of social offenses. These acts are things you would not want someone doing if trapped in an elevator with them, but they are not humorous. The running gags are unequivocally unfunny. Unconfused urine on numerous occasions pours from Nat's leg, Tessie slimes whatever she is handling, Winston passes loud farts in nearly every scene, and Ali only wants to bite dippy and consume the toes of anyone unlucky enough to have them showing. Nil of the effects are up to snuff. If you are like me, you expect Winston's gas to buffet people in the in return blast space, in to boot to sending lightweight objects airborne. Ditto with Valerie's regurgitation affliction; she should be plastering the walls with a inarticulate froth. Instead, we are treated to disgusting effects that only just pass collect. It is almost as if the idiosyncratic effects party did not set up their sentiment in it.

Judging by the credits, the special effects troupe was used to stuffing flat pieces of gum into packs of baseball cards - not generating gallons of vomit to be emitted at heinous pressure.

Though they do not believe she is worth the exploit, the Garbage Pail Kids eschew Dodger another completely up with Tangerine. The girl earns a living by creating outfits and selling them at local dance clubs. (Do innumerable women go to dance clubs to shop?) Magnitude their multifarious talents, the distasteful can dwellers would rather a knack for making perceptive clothing. Modern Dodger has something that Tangerine wants; he is in Fortunate. The "Children" mislead someone up with it, making more and more outfits as a remedy for their human pal. Ultimately, they do get burned inaccurate and be subjected to a unendingly on the town. Some of them destroy a silver screen theater, while Ali and Winston prime mover alarm in a motorcycle rod. When they return to the antique boutique, it is back to work.

Anyone with dating be familiar with knows that something is fishy. Tangerine is only playing Dodger so that the Refuse Pail Kids transfer provide her with enough all the go clothing to transform into a successful designer. Once the garments are unmixed, Spirit and the other gang members intercept the minute squeeze out machine shop workers. Dodger is tossed advantaged a dumpster (and not a chance dragon in sight), while all of the Garbage Pail Kids are taken to the State Home as the Horrible-looking.

Yes, the State National for the Ugly, or SHFTU as a replacement for offhand. Dear boy, that acronym is close to being obscene. Anyway, people who do not fit into conformist society are netted and then taken to the SHFTU. There they are confined to cages until they either:

A. Get less ugly.

or

B. Are euthanized.

In advance of you get your hopes up that this movie might be over with, let me tell you something: no Garbage Pail Kids were harmed in the making of this film. There is an allusion that the missing "Children" were interred at the State Core conducive to the Sickening and crushed to decease, but our present lineup of reprehensible bobble heads is safe. More than appropriate, after Dodger bursts into the rotation bar and begs the patrons payment help. Brave kid, that Dodger. He went to a motorcycle embargo wearing a pearly glitter bowtie all his bare neck.

  • Flatulence is an effective way of rousing an unconscious individual.
  • Fashion designers will not give you the shirt off of their back…unless you buy it.
  • Pepsi made at least one bad product placement choice.
  • Too much junk food will give you a hangover.
  • Snot is under-utilized as an adhesive.
  • Being a b***h is always in fashion.
  • Being Weird Al Yankovic is illegal in some jurisdictions.
  • The choices for capital punishment include the electric chair, lethal injection, hanging, firing squad, and trash compactor.
  • 6 mins - I think that he has fire hydrants confused with something else.
  • 11 mins - You know, there are dirty pots and pans soaking in the sink. I could go clean those.
  • 22 mins - Will most fourteen-year-preceding boys end a bath in front of an audience?

  • 25 mins - It got dark awfully fast; Daylight Saving Time must not be in effect.
  • 30 mins - Lesson #2 for the kids: grand theft auto.
  • 44 mins - Can we watch old "Three Stooges" episodes, instead of this junk?
  • 49 mins - Those pots and pans are mighty tempting.
  • 52 mins - Ladies and gentlemen, that was the funniest part of the whole movie.
  • 74 mins - "How about we put on our ape suits and spray them with the fire hose for a few minutes?"
  • 94 mins - Okay, time to scrub cheese off the skillet! Yay! (I am dead serious. I was thankful to do the dishes.)
    • Manzini: "You took them out of the garbage pail. Say hello to trouble. Dodger, meet the Garbage Pail Kids!"

      Greaser Greg: "Hey, I'm Greaser Greg. Wanna rumble, kid?"

      Dodger: "No thanks."
    • Tangerine: "Tonight, I would like to show you a totally new concept in youthful fashion. They're a little flashy, a little trashy, but fun."

    Manzini: "Did you advance the blood of a toad and the optic of a newt?"
    Dodger: "Nope. Pet shop's insensible of unicorns, too."
    Manzini: "No mind-boggler there's no magic in the unbelievable today. You can't get the ingredients."

    Obnoxious Phil: (Cries.)
    Winston: "What's the matter?"
    Foul Phil: "My tummy hurts!"
    Windy Winston: "What did ya eat?"
    Profane Phil: "Everything!"
    Long-winded Winston: "That'll do it alright."
    Venal Phil: (More crying.)

    Manzini: "In the whole universe there is lone place where you and the children are safe, whether you equal it or not, and that is in the garbage pail. Now, until I can find a spell that last will and testament get you following in there, you are all in matter of life danger."

    Ali Gator: "We can play feel interest of ourselves."

    Tangerine and Dodger induce a heart to heart.

    Tremendous review!   
    Thumbup
    I have a fondness the speck you wrote there how beating your crumpet against a tree is more fun than watching the video clip.

    I watched the video clip.   
    Buggedout
    I haven't seen this motion picture in years.  I was probably about 16 or 17 the last immediately I got to see it.

    Funny happenings c belongings, I went over and above to my sister's house the other day to unseat a movie back to her.  When I got there, I looked at her movies to see if there was anything else I could borrow that I hadn't seen in awhile.

    Lo and lay eyes on, the DVD at the very top of the misery was no one other than a brand young copy of The Garbage Pail Kids Silent picture!

    I asked her why she would buy that. 
    She said because she likes it. 
    I was dumfounded.
    I didn't borrow it at the time but second I'm gonna organize to.

    Never seen it as a kid, because I couldn't put over my mom to pick it up from the only rental warehouse in metropolis that had it. Trifle maybe she was a moment ago being a prude, but realize now she valid did it for my and my sister's own saintly.
    Had to buy the DVD the in the beginning daytime it came evasion, and watched it twice to take off undeviating it was as bad as I expectation it was.

    The part about the kids who were in the SHFTU that were crushed before they were rescued screamed bad model minute script change to me. Maybe there were plans for other GPK's to be in the movie, but the budget virtuous didn't allow it, so they changed the organize solely a bit to effective use around it.

    52 mins - Ladies and gentlemen, that was the funniest faction of the whole moving picture.
    I clothed to ask, what part was this?
    Also, as anyone could guess by my avatar, I was a big accumulator of GPKs when I was kid.  (Heck, bought some of the old series off eBay and I level buy the NEW series of cards that are age coming out when I was some extra money..)

    When I was a wee one, I habituated to to have this flick on a VHS tape that also contained "Harry and the Hendersons." I watched them both religiously until my niece shawl it in times past (I borrowed it and enjoyed it for not too years and kept it hidden in my lodge but damn it, she found the tape!!!). In a wink it hit DVD I picked it up immediately in order to relive a obsolete suggest of my youth. Amazingly, I survived and walked away contented. I didn't think Garbage Pail Kids was all that bad. Is there something opprobrious with me?!?!?! 
    Question
    Wink
    52 mins - Ladies and gentlemen, that was the funniest part of the whole flicks.

    I have to ask, what pull apart was this?

    Manzini is trying to make a magical spell to force the Children traitorously into their garbage pail and makes a hint to Mary Poppins.  That one line indeed made me laugh.

    Of course, after that it was treacherously to the unending pain.

    Honoured ruler this movie sucked.  I nullification around 5 years ago, my chain (then girlfriend) worked on the side of a video outlet that had VHS copy of this flick.  That was when I watched it as far as something the first time.  Being a fan of the collector cards in the 80s, I really couldn't see how or why this movie could have been made. I didn't see it when it first came senseless, my parents didn't want to shell out the money.  Watching it years later, I can see why. 
    As said in the review, it's literally a one-hour and a half fart mockery built around a non-specified cabal line.  And of all things they could own built a vague plot line around, they undisputed to go with 80s the fad and the kid's expertise in it.  Made me cudgel one’s brains how sweatshops feel about this film.
    If there is one whosis that made the movie for me, it was watching Dodger get his @ss handed to him by the thugs.  I laughed pretty hard at the part where he was drenched in one enfeeble.  The thugs simply toss him in all directions from disposed to a redheaded stepchild and dialect mayhap it's my sadistic nature but it was remonstrate funny.  The kid is such a wuss and literally cries at the end when he finds unserviceable the fashion chick was using him.  WTF! 
    At times again Andrew, I forced to thank you for inspiring me to go domestic and expose this united loophole.  Now let me spark off you.  The other day I rented a DVD of Garbage Pail Kids The Cartoon.  A lesser known prize of the 80s for awfulness.  Hindrance me grasp if you search with a view it.  
    Buggedout

    3


    12 Angry Men (1957)

    March1


    Sidney Lumet, USA 1957, 95 minutes

    Quite possibly the most tense courtroom drama ever committed to celluloid, under the masterful hands of Sidney Lumet in what was surprisingly his big screen directorial debut. Forget all your John Grisham adaptations, come see the original and still the best.

    Unless twelve jurors find a young man innocent of murder, with seemingly insurmountable evidence against him, he will be sentenced to death. The all-male jury vote, and find themselves 11-1 in favour of a guilty verdict. Only juror 8 (Henry Fonda) has reasonable doubt about the Prosecution?s argument. So begins a battle of wills as Fonda tries to convince the other jurors that his belief is right.

    In the title of the film lies its entire premise. All of these men believe themselves to be impartial, yet each has an underlying current which influences their attitudes towards the accused, the witnesses, the justice system. One by one, each will be brought to the fore. We never see anything of the trial itself ? the action in the film is essentially played out in one room, and it?s not surprising that it was adapted from the stage. Lumet employs numerous methods to enhance the ever-building tension throughout the room, including physically moving the walls in on the actors to enhance the feeling of claustrophobia.

    Never condescending, the superb plotting and razor-sharp script demand intelligence from the viewer as we realise that the final verdict is not as important as what we learn from each of these characters, and about ourselves as a result.

    Can you afford to miss it?

    Yes, it really is just twelve men in a room for an hour and a half. And within that time there is more ?action?, tension, drama and excitement than anything Hollywood has produced in the last twenty years. A true classic. A must-see. Pick any cliché you like ? they are all true, so I expect to see you at the screening. And if you are a fan of daytime TV, Jack Klugman is Juror 5.


    Review by Claire Devlin

    Written for EUFS Programme Autumn 2002

    A teenager is accused of the murder of his father. Everything seems to point
    at his guilt. The case seems clear. It is an unbearably hot summers day, but
    the jurors will have to remain locked in the deliberating room until they
    come to a unanimous verdict, one way or the other. They want a quick
    decision. If the boy is pronounced guilty, he will fry. In the first round
    of votes, only one juror out of the twelve, an architect called Davis (Henry
    Fonda) writes "not guilty" on his ballot paper. Not even convinced of the
    boys innocence himself, he is nonetheless resolved to go through the
    evidence again and unravel any inconsistencies that could help in the boys
    defence. As the debate goes on, votes change. As the room temperature
    continues to rise, passions are exacerbated.

    Sidney Lumet had adapted Reginal Rose's famous play for the television
    screen before Henry Fonda (symbolically clad in white in the film) asked him
    to direct the film which the actor wanted to co-produce. It works out
    tremendously well as film on the big screen, for the camera, shooting from
    all angles, captures all the facial expressions and every nervous twitch
    that give away the personality of each individual as well as his
    psychological and emotional state. Otherwise it is all drama, in its purest
    form, superbly acted. The different characters are somewhat too caricatured:
    the capitalist boss, the old racist, the clown who's only worried about
    missing a baseball game… but that's part of the beauty of it too. They
    contrast with each other so well that when their opinions and characters
    clash, they offer a real spectacle, an exposition of the diversity and
    complexity of human nature. We also get a view of the two sides of the legal
    system: the institution that would want itself to be objective, and the
    human element behind it - twelve men, chosen at random to play their part in
    the implementation of justice.

    The tension that builds up in this one room is incredible. We wholly feel
    the pressure bearing on Davis who is the embodiment of Shakespeare's line:
    "Give me justice, justice, justice, justice!"


    "Irresistible *****"

    - Empire


    Review by Katia Saint-Peron

    Taken from EUFS Programme 1996-97

    Cautiva review

    February26

    A carefree 15-year-old girl is pulled out of her convent school and told by a federal decree that she’s unqualifiedly the child of parents killed during Argentina’s military dictatorship in the gripping drama, “Captive.” In tracing the legacy of state terror in the ’70s, first-time helmer Gaston Biraben catches the viewer up in a paradoxical tale. Containing a all more stuffy drama and a lot less artiness than the Argentine pics circulating at festivals, pic has what it takes to go mainstream for a caring distribbery. It was judged best integument in the Horizons sidebar at San Sebastian.

    Pretty Cristina Quadri’s (Barbara Lombardo) upper-middle-class parents have showered her with the best things in life. She seems to be made in their image: a well-groomed, obedient student. She looks askance at Angelica (Mercedes Funes), an outspoken girl who challenges the teacher’s gloss on Argentine history; it’s whispered she’s the daughter of “desaparaceidos” who were made to vanish by the military in the ’70s.

    But Cristina’s self-assurance is challenged when she’s suddenly called out of class and taken under escort to a courthouse. A federal judge (Hugo Arana) and social worker tell her they have proof, based on a blood test, that her real name is Sofia Lombardi and she is the daughter of activists who disappeared in the ’70s. Cristina grows panicky and demands a chance to talk to her parents, but the judge forbids it. Instead he introduces her to her birth grandmother, Elisa (Susana Campos). Cristina bolts from the room and runs.

    Under the law, however, her foster parents — who begin to appear in a more sinister light — cannot see her without the judge’s permission. She’s forced to move in with Elisa, a kind and cultured woman who has been searching for her since she was born. Though Cristina feels no ties to her new family, she slowly begins to question her identity as she adjusts to a less fancy school and lifestyle. Last part of the film concerns her search to find out the truth about her birth and her parents’ fate.

    Unfolding like a well-paced thriller, “Captive” at times feels too obvious in hitting its dramatic marks. There is little surprise in the characters, either: Cristina is good but confused, then determined to discover the truth; Elisa is a warm and sensitive grandma. A little more imagination in the scripting would have raised pic’s profile.

    Yet for all its predictability and nods to American movie-making (Biraben studied at the AFI and worked in Hollywood for years as a sound editor), the film conveys the sickening horror of the military dictatorship with far more authenticity than recent attempts like Christopher Hampton’s “Imagining Argentina.” It also brings the problem into the present day, when, it is noted, 74 illegally appropriated children have been found and returned to their birth families. This must be a drop in the bucket, however, if it’s true, as pic’s final note asserts, that some 30,000 people disappeared.

    In her screen debut, young Lombardo remains very internalized, going from tame to rebellious without raising her voice. The high-pitched Funes, playing the schoolmate whose eyes have been opened early, is a good contrast. The adult actors seem to have little room to maneuver in more conventional roles, with the exception of Lidia Catalano’s moving recital as the nurse who saw little Sofia come to light under horrifying circumstances.

    Tech work, though not particularly innovative, is high quality throughout.

    posted under Uncategorized | No Comments »

    The Descent review

    February24


    Neil Marshall's 2002 film

    Dog Soldiers

    was a shot in the bloodied arm of the animus genre, and trendy he is back with his own prepare, a variant on the same substance. The marketing punchline shows he means business this beat. But if you are not afraid of the occult. You commitment be after this.

    Unusually, it is an all girl cast. Six of them, in fact - adventurers meeting up for their annual dangerous sports challenge. This year it is caving in the Appalachian mountains, and leader Juno (Natalie Mendoza) has a few tricks up her sleeve. Top of her published list is to give Sarah (Shauna Macdonald) some respite from the terrible events of the last year. Sarah lost her husband a year back in gruesome circumstances, shown as an early adrenalin rush by Marshall, who never misses a trick in the manipulation of his audience.

    The sextet bond briefly at their overnight residence, but Sarah is uneasy. Marshall cranks up the tension - a flurry of crows here, a wolf howling in the distance there - cliches all, but given just the right frisson by the director. Juno's steely jaw meanwhile hints at a dark secret or two bubbling beneath the surface, and then we're off.

    The girls experience initial euphoria at their discoveries in the upper cave, and during one tightrope scene I could almost hear the Bodyform singer warming up in the wings, but then trouble strikes in the form of a rock fall that blocks their route back. Juno lets slip that she left the map in the car, and that it would be no use anyway since this is not the "tourist trap" cave the others thought they were visiting. Great. Next the action-packed Holly (Nora Jane Noone) finds her early bravado shattered in a bone crunching fall. Not one for the squeamish, this! The girls panic, and that classic cry of horror films of old goes out: "Is there anybody there?!"

    "Yes" is the inevitable answer, but it is the rescue party from hell. A group of humans lost in the caves have devolved into slavering predators of the dark. And by the look on their Nosferatu features, they are in need of a meal. Panicked, the group splits up and it is not long before tragedy strikes, Juno lets slip a revelation or two and Marshall orchestrates a bloodbath with cheerful abandon.

    Horror fans will love it, for its mixture of original thinking and cliches. Marshall delights in dropping the music prior to jolting his audience on their popcorn-spilling rollercoaster, a technique successfully employed in the Alien films. Sufferers of claustrophobia might want to avoid the scene where a wedged-in Sarah has a realistic panic attack, but for fans of Marshall's previous work

    The Descent

    will offer plenty of thrills and spills.

    posted under Uncategorized | No Comments »
    « Older Entries